 |
 |
 |
 |
Seven
Questions Most CRM Vendors are Afraid You'll Ask Download
the Free Onyx White Paper |
| Top News |
 |
Animals
in Pants - Ask Ad Spots
Ask.Com is advertising. It recently released two commercials intended for US audiences,
both of which use monkeys to express ideas an older English butler could not...
Full
Story |
 |
Microsoft
Offers U2 Licensing
Hardware licenses for technologies developed by Microsoft provide third-party
firms the opportunity to build devices based on those innovations... Full
Story |
 |
Bloggers
Gaming Google Finance
To gain added exposure for their stories, some bloggers have begun taking advantage
of the way Google Finance incorporates content as part of a company's information
page... Full
Story |
 |
Google
Surprise: A New Stock Sale
Another 5.3 million shares of GOOG, worth about $2.1 billion at current valuation,
should help smooth the company's entry into the S&P 500 index... Full
Story |
 |
Tongue
In Cheek With Oral Pixation
Recently (very), we reported about the upcoming "happening" set up by
self-named Oral Pixation, who asks the world to show what's in its mouth and post
the photos up on Flickr - on April Fool's Day... Full
Story |
 |
Microsoft
Shares Buoyed...
Intra-day trading on Microsoft lifted the stock price by 14 cents, but concerns
raised by the European Commission over the forthcoming Vista operating system
could prove troublesome... Full
Story |
| Top
WPW Discussion Posts |
KinderStart
Sues Google Over PageRank - Cont.
...What if I had a children's website appearing on Kinderstart directory. I was
getting some great clicks from their pages and then one day, they redesigned the
website and during this process removed some directory entries because they felt
it didn't work in the new design. Could I cry foul and sue KinderStart because
I am no longer appearing on the directory even through my business became "dependant"
on it?
Will (Ask.com's) Ads
Work?
So, I've been very impressed by the new Ask.com ad campaign. I think these ads
might actually get people to go over to ask and use the "tools" as they
say. What do you think? Is Ask going to become a viable engine?
Dupe Content: Where
Does It Lie?
I've been hearing a lot about duplicate content lately, but I want to pinpoint
exactly why Google and any other engine considered it "dupe content".
Is it in the title tag, the alt tag, the keyword tag, in the page content itself,
in the url? How does the spider determine what is dupe content, which leads to
omitted results?
Mass Submission to
Search Engines
When I first started out in the web design business (many moons ago) sites like
submitit and submitexpress were commonplace and used quite frequently. I am helping
someone out who is using a DIY package who includes a link to submit express that
they have used. My question(s) is: Was this a dumb thing to do?
Search Engines as Leeches
on the Web
... Basically, Nielsen's argument is that pay-per-click advertising siphons off
the profitablilty of webistes, and ultimately the search engines can be the only
winners from companies bidding against each other for keywords.
|
|
Thursday Mar 30, 2006 |
One day, my pie in the sky will be crumbs on a plate. Full-bellied, my GoogleNet
wireless connection will intuitively retrieve an ad for Alka-Seltzer; the bubbly
concoction plop-plop fizz-fizzes with tiny executive voices admitting in fizzy
whispers, "yes, Jason, Google's full of it."
Editor's Note: Is the GoogleNet still just a pipedream envisioned
by true believers? Or is there enough evidence to predict its reality? Or are
both viewpoints missing the mark? Sound off in WebProWorld.
On March 16th, three patents were published by the US Patent & Trademark office, granting wireless patents to Google employees. The patents, in large comforting letters at the top, announce the subject of their protection:
Patent #20060058019: Method and system for dynamically modifying the appearance of browser screens on a client device.
In one embodiment, a connection of a client device to a wireless access point is identified. Further, the appearance of a screen presented on the client device is modified to reflect the brand associated with a provider of the wireless access point.
Patent #20060059043: Method and system to provide wireless access at a reduced rate
Methods and system for providing wireless access at a reduced rate. In one embodiment, access to a WAP is provided to an end-user at a rate subsidized by a first entity. The first entity includes advertisements in an end-user view.
Patent #20060059044: Method and system to provide advertisements based on wireless access points
Methods and system to provide advertisements in a view of an end user accessing a wireless access point. The advertisements are related to the WAP based on a predetermined criterion.
I'm bad at math, let's double check. System for reducing wireless rates + way to serve ads based on wireless access points + technology to alter browser to show sponsors of access points = x.
When CNet asked Google about the patents, the Internet advertising authority responded with a wordy "so what?"
"Like many companies, we file patent applications on a variety of ideas that our employees may come up with. Some of those ideas later mature into real products or services; some don't," a company representative said. "Prospective product announcements should not be inferred from our patent applications."
But, but, but, but…didn't they just last month join forces with Earthlink to propose a two-tiered wireless citywide service to San Francisco? Well yeah, because Google and Earthlink believe in open access to the worlds information.
"We have submitted this proposal because at Google we're focused on creating new technologies that make it easier for people to quickly access the world's information," said Google.
"Customers shouldn't be tied to their desks, or to a single provider, to get the Internet experience they want. Both EarthLink and Google recognize this and are attempting to provide great service and choice in San Francisco," said Earthlink.
Seven
Questions Most CRM Vendors are
Afraid You'll Ask Download
the Free Onyx White Paper |
|
A little while back, Robert X. Cringely asserted that Google would not morph into an Internet service provider because ISP's are "lousy businesses." But one thing missed here is that advertising and media companies are not lousy businesses. Google is morphing into a network, and teaming up with ISP's to deliver content and advertising.
Let's do some more math. Google buys up dark fiber nationwide + alphabet soup of speedy extra capacity Internet technology + huge databases + wireless advertising patents + deals with Earthlink + deals with media companies + WiFi testing in San Francisco= x.
Google, notoriously secretive, has a preference for hedged statements with phrasing like "at this time" and "announcements should not be inferred." A maybe-maybe-not stance is protection against failure. No promises equals no liability.
In addition to that, the wireless ad-supported network they may or may not be envisioning will face fierce opposition from huge telecommunications companies who don't willing let anybody cut in on their turf, not even for emergencies.
Is the GoogleNet a pie in the sky? Maybe, but it's losing altitude all the time.
About
the Author:
Jason is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business. |
|
Searching for Edina Realty on Google returns a top-of-the-page sponsored link
run by TheMLSonline.com, and Edina Realty has sued the advertiser over use of
its trademark.
Even though the lawsuit involved Google and keywords, for once no one has shown
up at the Googleplex bearing warm greetings and a stone-cold subpoena. In Edina
Realty, Inc. v. TheMLSonline.com, Marquette law professor Eric Goldman has blogged
that the case equates keyword purchases to trademark infringement.
"That's what makes this case significant. I think this is the first case
substantively analyzing a purchaser's liability for buying a competitor's keyword,"
he wrote in his post.
TheMLSonline.com purchased keywords like "Edina Realty" and several
variations, including misspellings, on both Google and Yahoo. Yahoo recently changed
its policy for trademark purchases, restricting them to being eligible for purchase
only by the trademark holder. Google does not do this.
Along with the keyword purchases, TheMLSonline.com also indulged in placing hidden
text on its site, Goldman noted. Phrases like "Edina Realty information presented
at TheMLSonline.com" were hidden as white text on a white background.
The impact of the court's initial ruling that the purchase of keywords, though
not conventional, is a use in commerce, could have implications down the road.
Goldman believes a couple of key points arose from the ruling.
Read
the Full Article
About
the Author:
David is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business. |
|
PPC Advertising: Not Long For This World?
Well, another WebProWorld feature post section is upon, and it appears the topic
of PPC advertising remains at the forefront. However, today's particular post
deals with concept of PPC being at a point where it may have run it's course,
or to put it as the poster did, is PPC dying?
That's an interesting point to consider, especially when Google themselves say
click fraud is one of the biggest threats to their overall income. That's
a lot of eggs in that basket and if the basket starts unravel, who knows what
happens to Google (or Yahoo, Ask, and MSN Search for that matter). Anyway, check
out the post below and see if you have anything to add.
|| Chris||
 |
Low
Rate eCommerce & Retail Plans
Click Here for
fast and easy setup |
Is Pay Per Click Soon to Die?
As most of you probably know, billing for adverts on major search engines occurs
via a Cost Per Click model. Each click on a particular ad drives up the bill for
advertisers.
I have been thinking about why this business model is unstable and likely to collapse
in the near future; I would be interested in hearing your opinions on this matter.
As research shows, more and more businesses are turning to search engine paid
marketing strategies for their promotionnal needs, as a result cost per clicks
on average are rising due to the growth of advertisers. In the current state of
things I would without a doubt say that most advertisers are obtaining good return
of investements with this method of advertising.
|
| ::
WebPro Question: |
I was wondering if you can have a stationary background even though you're not
using it on the whole page? - LiviLou
Comment
|
|
|
|