 |
 |

Blog Style Ed Note. Innovation, innovation, and still more innovation.
Welcome to the new WebProNews BlogStyle editor's note. My goal is for you to take
from here quick bites of information, tasty little brain snacks that feed both
your curiosity and your need for more traffic and sales.
That said, the blog needs a name, and I need your help coming up with it. (The
only thing I could come up with was BlogDog. Don't ask.) We'll pick a winner in
the next issue. Send your suggestions to me here.
eCommerce Review Project. The project. My baby. All I can tell you
is that we're getting there, as I predicted, slowly. I've got 7 or so committed,
intelligent, e-savvy web professionals on our review team. They're all ready to
go and are waiting for me to talk one more time with our product providers. I'm
aiming for an early December launch.
Hats Off. Yes, we have more than one newsletter here at iEntry. If
you get any of our other newsletters, there's a good chance that I chose the content
for it. That's why I know that in yesterday's issue of MarketingNewz we had an
AWESOME interview with RedHat's
e-mail newsletter editor. I recommend it for all you publishers out there.
|
|
| Reader Testimonial: |
» Reader: John
Leach
I always (and I mean always) enjoy WebProNews. Testify |
|
Inbox Battle. I'm still, er, losing the battle of the inbox. Yes,
I'm swamped by email, and the longer I take to sort it out the harder it gets.
Tim of TAKdesign said:
First I delete or forward anything I do not NEED to deal with. It is surprising
how many things you really don't have to deal with if you get tough about it.
Then I move things into one of many folders, some based on a timeline for action
(i.e. this week) and others into category emails. I know that the emails in the
timeline folders are the highest priority and I always try to deal with them first.
Your newsletter almost always goes into my webdev folder to be read when I have
the time. This keeps my inbox fairly clean (less than 20-30 emails), which allows
me to actually see what is coming at me on a daily basis. I have reclaimed my
life from email!
Thanks Tim!
Ingenuity. I stumbled upon a site (search term: creative blog names)
with pictures and drawings of inventions
made by prisoners. Rubber bands, metal clips from file folders, a toothbrush:
all these materials combine to make a device that heats water when you stick it
into an outlet. Not exactly GE, but it works.
What do you think of the new ednote style? Let
me know!
See you soon,
Garrett |
Dissecting Search Engine Result Pages
By
Shari Thurow
Reader question: I have never paid for a listing in any search engine and want
to know why my site appears in both LookSmart and Mamma. I have also never submitted
to AOL and MSN but notice it is also included? My question is how come?
Answer: The answer to this reader question is two-fold. First is the issue of
the type of search engine. Most search engine results pages (SERPs) present information
from a variety of search engine resources, usually a human-based search engine,
a crawler-based search engine, and a pay-per-click search engine.
The next issue is how crawler-based search engines, such as Google, work. If a
site is naturally search-engine friendly, then a crawler-based search engine will
find your Web pages naturally.
Multiple results from a single search engine
As I stated previously, the results from a search engine results page come from
a variety of resources. You can read details about the anatomy of a search engine
results page (SERP) from one of my previous articles entitled Understanding Search
Engine Results Pages.
The reader specifically mentions LookSmart, AOL Search, MSN Search, and Mamma.com.
I will go over the SERP for each of these.
First, let's look at LookSmart. I performed a search for "classified travel specials"
(without the quotes) because that is the service that the reader offers on his
Web site. At the top of the page is the label that states:
Results for "classified travel specials" from our Sponsors
That listings underneath these search results are advertisements. Any time you
see the word "sponsor" or "sponsorships," think advertising. Someone had to pay
for that listing. Currently, sponsored results come from LookSmart customers who
are willing to pay for the advertising space. Currently, only four listings at
a time appear in this area.
The next section of the LookSmart SERP has a label that states:
Results for "classified travel specials" from the Directory
The Web pages listed underneath this heading are results that come from the LookSmart
directory. In order to get in the directory, a Web site owner must select a category,
write a title and a description (not the same as the HTML title tag and meta-tag
description), pay the submission fee, and wait for a LookSmart editor to evaluate
the site and add it to the directory.
The next section of the LookSmart SERP has a label that states:
Results for "classified travel specials" from the Web
The Web pages listed underneath this heading are results that come from the crawler-based
search engine, WiseNut. The reader's site is not appearing in the ads or the directory
results. The site is appearing because the crawler-based search engine, WiseNut,
was able to find the site due to other sites linking to his site.
So think: ...
Click
Here to Read the Full Article
About the Author:
Shari Thurow is Marketing Director at Grantastic Designs, Inc., a full-service
search engine marketing, web and graphic design firm. This article is excerpted
from her book, Search Engine Visibility (http://www.searchenginesbook.com)
published in January 2003 by New Riders Publishing Co. Shari can be reached at
shari@grantasticdesigns.com. 
New
Conversion Tracking Tools Offered by Both Overture and Google
Ever wonder if your keyword campaigns are paying off? Hot on the heels of Overture,
Google Ad Words https://adwords.google.com/select/
has announced its own free conversion tracking tool. Advertisers can now track
whether users arriving via keywords are actually converting.
 |
www.traffic-monster.net
Can you take a look at my site and give your opinion about it? Negative or
positive; I don't mind.
If there is something you would do different and you would like to share it, please
do. ... If you review my site, I'll review yours...
Review/Comment
on Site
|
|

Note from Brittany
By
Brittany
WebProNews readers,
What keeps you flocking back to your favorite search engine? Chances are, it's
the quality and relevance of the search results. In today's featured WebProWorld
discussions, we analyze what makes a good search engine, in addition to providing
tips for achieving better ranking on the current search engine king: Google. Have
fun discussing!
Popularity
Equals Quality or Relevance?
By
Conficio
What are we expecting from a good search engine? Do we expect to be pampered with
what is already popular? Does popularity equal quality?
Who thinks Hamburgers from McDonalds or Burger King are popular food, or Donuts
from Krispy Kreme for that matter? Well they clearly are! Who thinks these food
are quality food? ....
The point I try to make here is: search engines should deliver quality answers
to my query, not what other people think is hip or popular. This might be an interesting
aspect of research or for comparison (such as how popular is my competition or
who are the most popular three in a certain field?), but for quality results it
does not really matter...
The
Effectiveness of Sitemap/Crawler Pages
By WildSeeker
I read an article recently that made a point of endorsing the inclusion of a sitemap
or crawler page within one's site. The theory being: "the crawler page is a site
map that lists all the pages on your site — it may be a bit too big for humans
to read through, but it will be no problem for a search engine. Add an obscure
link to the crawler page on one of your site's top-level pages, using a small
amount of text. ... The crawler page won't show up in search results. It does
get pulled into the search engine's index, but because it has no text or tags
to match a query, it isn't listed as a result. The pages it links to, however,
will appear because the search engine's spider found them right after it visited
the crawler page."
I would be interested in feedback on this concept and its effectiveness. ...
RE:
Google Keywords: Is Less More?
By
rlrouse
dcaul: I've heard conflicting information regarding the correct
number of keywords (from a variety of sources and forums). Some say to place up
to 50 words and phrases in your metatags, while others are saying that each page
should focus on two or three words/phrases...
rlrouse: Try to concentrate a couple of keywords/phrases near
the top of the page in the content. The trick is working them in so that there
is a natural flow where the text makes sense. I have discovered over time that
keyword density for the page as a whole isn't as important as getting your keywords
into the first couple of paragraphs a few times. ...
|
|
|
|