|
Free
Logo Review
I would like to invite you to submit your logo for my credibility meter test.
Please include a description of your business and what makes you unique in this
business.
I will let you know if you are projecting your business as credible or not credible
on a scale of one to ten. If you score high, I will tell you why. If you score
low, I will give you suggestions for improvement. I may also comment on your company
name.
Thanks, Bill
Visit Bill in the forums
and submit your logo for review!
 |
Learn The Eight Traits Of A Powerful Logo |
Learn The Eight Traits Of A Powerful Logo
By William L. Haig
The company logo is probably the most important marketing tool on your business
card or website. It gives your company a competitive advantage and will help you
achieve company goals. This is not the role of just any logo. You must have a
POWERLOGO.
This article tells you the eight criteria your logo must have to be a POWERLOGO.
These criteria are based on the teachings of logo design legend, Saul Bass
(AT&T, Rockwell International, United Way, Alcoa, Minolta, United Airlines,
Continental Airlines circa 1968 -1982 among many others). Saul’s teachings
were refined in university-supervised research I conducted as part of an advanced
degree in Communication* which later became the premise of my best-selling book,
The Power of Logos: How to Create Effective Company Logos.
(Note: the following traits are excerpts from Bill's article. Please
click here to view the complete article. -G)
1. Logos must be credibility-based. This is essential. It is
based on a simple principle: credibility persuasion. Just as credible people are
more influential, so are company logos on the business card or letterhead. Many
studies in people to people communication conclude that if a person as the source
of the message is competent or knowledgeable as well as trustworthy, then the
message will be more readily accepted by the receiver. The person is considered
credible and more influential.
The research I conducted several years ago supports my premise that if a company
logo as the source of the message is also designed as competent, knowledgeable,
or expert in its field of business as well as trustworthy, then the company’s
message will be more readily accepted by the receiver --- most often the customer.
Knowing “what” to put into the logo in the first place is 90 percent
of the logo design job! Design is important. Content is more important.
2. Logos must symbolize the company business to be credibility-based.
Ok, how does a logo become credibility-based? It is easy to understand that when
a computer wiz talks about the best compact to buy, he will be more influential
on this subject than, say, a chef. And, if a chef talks about a new restaurant
in town, he will be more influential on this subject than the computer wiz (well,
in most cases).
The first thing a competent credibility-based logo designer does is symbolize
the company business in the logo. Voila! This says that the company is an expert
in that business. Like the shoe repair or key shops with their signs depicting
their business. We know their business specialty. This is the key to a successful
logo, but there is more.
3. Logos must also be designed to communicate that the company
is trustworthy. This gets a bit more tricky to understand, but here we go. Tom
Housen of Housen Painting is a house painter. In the beginning process of creating
this logo, we first symbolized “house painting,” which is Tom’s
area of expertise. Here are examples of some of the steps we went through in the
course of its development.
(see the complete
article for image examples)
4. Logos must be planned. A great logo doesn’t come out
of thin air. It has a basis for being. Logos have content and they have design
form. Content and design must work together to communicate what the logo is to
“say.” This requires a plan. Our planning process is based
on substance. We want to know what content and what design form the logo is to
“say” to be effective.
Powerlogos Design first asks our clients to fill out a questionnaire. When
we analyze the questionnaire what do we look for?
We look for traits which make this client credible.
5. Logos must use the symbol over (or beside on the left)
the company name. There are three trademarking systems almost all logos fit into:
6. Logos must communicate, communicate, communicate. Here
are the most common mistakes:
· Adding too much to the symbology so that the whole logo is confused
and cluttered. Less is more. Often designers have to explain each detail in the
logo. There should not have be an explanation that the “O” stands
for the sun rising; the “wiggly lines” stand for “the lush landscape”;
the “spaces between the wiggly lines” stand for the water flowing
through the landscape; the “red” color stands for…etc. Everything
in a logo must be simple and evident. A great logo needs no explanation.
· Making the name font compete with the symbol. This is the font that
is a design statement in and of itself. It is always complex. The name font should
always be simple, supporting the symbology. The symbol carries the burden of communicating
credibility. Not the name font.
· Placing the company name within the symbol. The name and symbol must
always be separated, with the symbol over or beside to the left of the name. Otherwise,
the visual confusion is obvious. Many logos have the name curl around the symbol,
causing the head and eye to follow each letter to read the whole name. We call
this “visual gymnastics.” 7. Logos must be
very prominent in application. Frequency and consistency are the key points here.
Frequency means that all areas of public contact must be utilized: Business
cards. Stationery. Forms. Trucks and vehicles. Shop or office signs. Site signs.
Employee caps, shirts and uniforms. Giveaways. Brochures. Advertisements. Proposal
covers.
Basic psychology tells us that the more frequent we experience something, the
more likely we will remember it. And it should be the same, or consistent, each
time.
Consistency is the most common breakdown in logo application. Try this. Put
up a “logo wall” somewhere in your office with all areas of current
logo application. More often than not, this is normally a hodge-podge -- as either
no one is responsible or implementation just happened without consideration as
to the logo working as a brand communication system.
8. The logo symbol and name must work together. Logo symbology
and the company name must both express credibility traits.
The symbology is a “visual” expression of company credibility.
The name is a “verbal” expression of company credibility.
Names like Mail Boxes Etc., The Closet Factory, and United Parcel Service are
all good descriptive of the company’s expertise. They are therefore credible
names.
On the other hand, names like Cebit, Retrospex and Hebasco do not describe
the company business, thus negating the opportunity to express their expertise
in their respective fields. These names are also hard to remember.
Trustworthy attributes can also be incorporated into a company’s name.
Names like Compaq for the personal computer is not only descriptive, but with
the “q” at the end suggests “high technology.” Zippy’s
Restaurants sound like a quick place to get a meal. Le Nouveau Riche Gourmand
restaurant connotes something more formal. And better to check the wallet before
going in.
Company names should also have longevity, as they are what we recall as the
company brand. If the credibility-based logos which express the brand image are
in the symbology, then the name must support the symbology for the entire logo
to be effective. (Already well-established names excepted.)
Please
Click here to read the complete article and see great examples of credible logos!
About the Author: For more information,
visit the website of William L. Haig http://www.powerlogos.com.
Mr. Haig can also be reached by phone, 808.922.4042 or by email, w.haig@verizon.net.
The principles of credibility-based logo planning, design and implementation may
be found in Mr. Haig’s best-selling logo book, The Power of Logos: How to Create
Effective Company Logos, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997. Please note: Several
examples of credibility-based logos can be found on Mr. Haig’s website in the
"Great Logos and Why" section. |
|